A contracting party may attempt to demonstrate the existence of a security contract if its right to the infringement is denied because the statement on which they were based is not considered to be the duration of the principal contract. It was decided that the explanation must have been so successful.  In the event of a breach of a security contract, corrective action may be taken. It can also be illustrated as follows: A support contract is a contract that encourages a person to enter into a separate “primary” contract. For example, if X agrees to purchase Y products manufactured accordingly by Z, on the basis of Z`s assurance of the high quality of the goods, X and Z may consider that X and Z have entered into a guarantee contract consisting of Z`s promise of quality, which, given X`s promise to enter into the main contract with Y , was given. , which means that authorized evidence of a support contract can be used to exclude the application of the Parol rule of evidence. In practice, it is rare to regard the warranty contract as an exception, as it must be strictly proven; and the burden of proof will only be lightened if the purpose with which the main contract is entered into is more unusual.  In 2008, attention was drawn to a form known as Repo 105 after the Lehman collapse, since repo 105s would have been used as an accounting device to mask the deterioration of Lehman`s financial health. Another controversial form of buyback order is the “internal repo,” which was first highlighted in 2005. In 2011, it was proposed that, in order to finance risky transactions on European government bonds, Rest could have been the mechanism by which MF Global endangered several hundred million dollars of client funds before its bankruptcy in October 2011. Much of the deposit guarantee is obtained through the re-library of other customer security.   In July 2011, bankers and the financial press expressed concern that the U.S.
debt ceiling, which led to a default, could lead to significant disruptions in the pension market if the U.S. debt crisis were to result in a default in 2011. This is because treasuries are the most widely used collateral in the U.S. pension market and, since a default would have degraded the value of Treasuries, this could have caused Repo borrowers to reserve many more collateral.  The only difference is that (i) the asset is sold (and then repurchased) while in (ii) the asset is rather mortgaged as collateral for a loan: in the sale and repurchase transaction, the ownership and ownership of SN are transferred from A to B and returned in tF from B to A; Conversely, in the case of the guaranteed loan, only the holding is temporarily transferred to B, while the property remains at A.